By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Monday, Jan 5, 2026
  • Opinion
  • Featured
  • Editor's Pick
  • Legal
  • women
  • Politics
  • women empowerment
  • India
Search
Login
Champion Women Empowerment
Support The Womb with $15 each month!
Support US
Dhwani
  • Opinion
  • Featured
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Legal
  • Politics
Reading: A New Turn of Page For Women In Indian Army : Latest Supreme Court Judgment Grants Permanent Commissions To Women
Explore by Topics
Subscribe
Font ResizerAa
DhwaniDhwani
  • World
  • International
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Culture
  • Travel
  • Sport
Search
  • Categories
    • Travel
    • Sport
    • Culture
    • Business
    • Lifestyle
  • More Foxiz
    • Login
    • Contact
    • Blog
    • Buy Theme
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© 2026 Foxiz. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Legal

A New Turn of Page For Women In Indian Army : Latest Supreme Court Judgment Grants Permanent Commissions To Women

Harleen Walia
Last updated: March 7, 2021 4:57 pm
By
Harleen Walia
No Comments
6 Min Read
Share
Disclosure: This website may contain affiliate links, which means I may earn a commission if you click on the link and make a purchase. I only recommend products or services that I personally use and believe will add value to my readers. Your support is appreciated!
SHARE

By Sharanya Venkataraghavan

On 23rd July, 2020, the Defence Ministry of India issued a notification allowing women to be granted permanent commission including ranks, promotions and pensions and be allowed to serve longer tenures and command postings in all services other than combat in the Indian Army. Following a Supreme Court decision in February this year, the Apex Court ordered that women be treated equally in terms of Permanent Commissions and retirement by the Indian Army which had previously only allowed women short-service commissions up to 14 years in the Army’s educational and legal wings. 

The Government made various dated arguments regarding why women must not be given permanent positions in the Indian Army in branches other than those currently allowed. The Government argued of a woman’s inability to sacrifice and commit to the same extent as men can since women’s domestic roles as a caretaker of her family restrict her. Further, the Government used arguments of physical and physiological “differences” between men and women to justify why women shouldn’t be allowed in the Indian Army. There were concerns of hygiene requirements of women and how men’s behaviour would have to be “moderated” around women. The thoughts of the Government were rooted in patriarchy where they reinforced stereotypes. They gave precedence to arguments of presence of women in the Army meaning male behaviour needing to be “moderated” over the rights of women who dream of serving the nation. 

The Court expressed a similar opinion, deeming such statements as “disturbing” and pointed out the stereotypes of women being the sole bearers of domestic obligations used by the Army.  The Court was upfront about how the current norms of erasing women’s merit purely based on gender is an affront to their gender and as members of the Indian Armed Forces. The Judges- Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Ajay Rastogi recognized the discriminatory practices of the Indian Army and the problems in their arguments, taking a stance against it. 

The Court adjudged Permanent Commission which has now been granted to women – giving them equal opportunities in the branches of Signals, Engineers, Army Aviation, Army Air Defence, Electronics and Mechanical Engineers, Army Service Corps, Army Ordinance Corps and Intelligence. This would apply to women currently working in SSC positions who would be considered for Permanent Commission and those who opt out would be allowed to continue till they attain 20 years of pensionable services. The same terms of receiving PC applicable for their male counterparts would be applicable to women and the option would be provided to women at the same level as their male counterparts. The Court didn’t offer any special privileges to women, but rather only provided them with the same opportunities offered to their male counterparts. However, women continue to be excluded in combat roles in the Army as the Court stated that it would have to be decided by a competent authority. 

A similar judgement was given by the Supreme Court on women in the Navy in March, 2020 where they stated women were equally efficient at sailing and must be allowed permanent commission, from providing women only shorter commissions. The Air Force was and is the first and only wing to have women in combat roles as on 8th March, 2020 with Avani Chaturvedi, Mohana Singh Jitarwal and Bhawana Kanth. After a row of Supreme Court judgements, the Indian Armed forces is finally ridding itself of generations of patriarchal thought and opening more doors for women in the Armed Forces.   

The Armed Forces started inducting women in 1992 for the first time in non-medical capacities. However, these women were only allowed to occupy short-service commissions of 6 years till it was extended to 14 years in 2006 while male counterparts with exemplary performance could move from Short-Service Commissions to Permanent Commission positions. This notification opens up in addition to legal and education streams- Signals, Engineers, Army Aviation, Army Air Defence, Electronics and Mechanical Engineers, Army Service Corps, Army Ordinance Corps and Intelligence where women may occupy on basis of merit- Permanent Commission positions. 

What next for the Indian Armed Forces? While women are slowly being integrated into the IAF, women are yet to be appointed to positions in combat and specialized forces, specifically in the Indian Army, women in the Navy are yet to be positioned on ships since they’re not designed to accommodate women and the list goes on. While the Indian Armed Forces is definitely opening itself up to women who are breaking stereotypes, there is a long way to go to normalization of women in the Armed Forced which is seen as a “male profession” and has been for years and the accommodation of women not merely as women pilots, soldiers, commanders but as colleagues working towards the same goal with the same sense of camaraderie. 

TAGGED:Legal

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Threads Copy Link
What do you think?
Love0
Sad0
Happy0
Sleepy0
Angry0
Dead0
Wink0
Previous Article Marital Rape in India
Next Article 10 Chairs Named After Eminent Women To Be Established In Varsities, Initiative To Motivate Young Girls And Women Towards Higher Studies
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Might Also Like

Featured

Devolution of Intestate Transgender’s Property

12 Min Read
Legal

A Sign of Obsoleteness: Marital Rape exception in the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita

10 Min Read
Featured

From Labharthi To Leaders, The Real Rakhi Gift Indian Women Need

7 Min Read
Featured

Using The Term “Item” To Address Any Girl Is Obviously Insulting In Nature: Special Pocso Court, Mumbai

14 Min Read

The Daily Newsletter

Brings you a selection of the latest news, trends, insights, and tips from around the world.

About US

The Focus Report is your trusted source for comprehensive and balanced news coverage. With a commitment to integrity and accuracy, we provide in-depth reporting that uncovers the stories that matter most.
Support US
  • World
  • International
  • Business
  • Lifestyle
  • Culture
  • Travel
  • Sport

More Links

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Complaint
  • Deal
Subscribe Newsletter
  • Daily Stories
  • Stock Arlets
  • Full Acess
Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?